Mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 22:3

אמר לו רבי אליעזר לא אם אמרת בחטאת שכן כשרה לשמה כל השנה כולה תאמר בפסח שאינו כשר לשמו אלא בזמנו הואיל והוא פסול לשמו דין הוא שיפסלו אחרים לשמו:

Now if the sin-offering is unfit when slaughtered as a burnt-offering, though its remainder comes as a burnt-offering; is it not logical that a burnt-offering slaughtered as a sin-offering is unfit, seeing that its remainder does not come as a sin-offering?<span class="x" onmousemove="('comment',' Yet in fact it is not unfit, which shews that an ad majus argument from the law of a remainder is inadmissible. As R. Eliezer does not answer that in his view it is indeed unfit, Rabbah deduces that he admits that other sacrifices slaughtered as sin-offerings are fit.');">²</span>

Explore mesorat%20hashas for Zevachim 22:3. In-depth commentary and analysis from classical Jewish sources.